Extensions :
K-Meleon Forum
Hi,
this file:
Scroll Restore
indicates, in it's .ini, to have a scrollrestore.kmm to be put in the macros folder.
But that scrollrestore.kmm is NOT in the download.
Cheers
SoerenB
No more own machines, because of addiction.
Don't know when I'll be back to normal ...
I've never used this extension so can't tell for sure but you are 99,9% right, Soeren. Disrupted should have scrollrestore.kmm on his computer and he'll update it.
sorry, that kmm entry in the uninstall ini is a mistake, the extension just needs the chrome and pref to function..it does remember scroll position on https.
gunter converted scroll restore and i just used an autoit template that auto creates the uninstall ini and it generates the macro kmm entry according to existing jar file(if available) assuming that every km extension should have a macro which isn't always the case... that's why humans are always better than computers but i guess airbus doesn't believe so..
All about K-Meleon extensions.
scrollrestore: download broken
Posted by:
SoerenB
Date: July 21, 2010 08:26PM
Hi,
this file:
Scroll Restore
indicates, in it's .ini, to have a scrollrestore.kmm to be put in the macros folder.
But that scrollrestore.kmm is NOT in the download.
Cheers
SoerenB
No more own machines, because of addiction.
Don't know when I'll be back to normal ...
Re: scrollrestore: download broken
Posted by:
Matt
Date: July 22, 2010 03:04AM
I've never used this extension so can't tell for sure but you are 99,9% right, Soeren. Disrupted should have scrollrestore.kmm on his computer and he'll update it.
Re: scrollrestore: download broken
Posted by:
disrupted
Date: July 22, 2010 09:39AM
sorry, that kmm entry in the uninstall ini is a mistake, the extension just needs the chrome and pref to function..it does remember scroll position on https.
gunter converted scroll restore and i just used an autoit template that auto creates the uninstall ini and it generates the macro kmm entry according to existing jar file(if available) assuming that every km extension should have a macro which isn't always the case... that's why humans are always better than computers but i guess airbus doesn't believe so..
