Feel free to alter/edit my post so that its English wording comes across better.
You are an admin and I do not mind.
Personally I think that the sites baring K-Meleon are maybe not evil but they are crippling o.ps' software, that is IMHO a PC sabotage and AFAIK a criminal offense in some countries. They do it deliberately. And they do it for gain. Lets face it: browsers are potential big business receiving venture capital.
AFAIK browser vendors get paid for selling their browser's default search engine position. And IMHO some sites that buy them bar browsers that a not part of their cartel/deal. Other sites that bar browsers (K-Meleon) are fully or partially owned by browser vendors themselves (Google: GMail, Maps..., MS: Hotmail, etc.).
Yes I agree best would be always K-Meleon - & use AutoSwicher when You often use sites that need camouflage. Siria's code should become part of AutoSwitcher. My ideal candidate for improving the potential effectiveness/stealth of the camouflage.
p.s. I do not remember the older macro from 2005. I do not remember many details of what was before 2007. There were cases when spoofing K-Meleons were excluded - potentially betrayed from the vendor strings. But no proof that this was the reason.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 02/06/2010 03:39PM by guenter.