Development :
K-Meleon Web Browser Forum
K-meleon's autoscrolling is much smoother on my display than Phoenix's autoscroll (which uses the Autoscroll xpi plugin).
Have other K-meleon/Phoenix users noticed this? If so, might the developers know why K-meleon's scrolling is smoother? It might be nice to share this secret with the other moz-scrolling developers, Autoscroll, Smoothscroll, and Multiscroll.
aharon
Display: IBM Thinkpad T30 LCD
Yeah I've noticed that, but KM's autoscroll does have it's bugs, namely trying to use it within frames. But from what I've heard, Mozilla, Phoenix's or Firebird's (too many damn names) :-) autoscroll uses XUL. I think KM's autoscroll is native to Windows, so it wouldn't be an easy copy for cross platform development I assume. Just a guess though.
Autoscrolling within frames is a known issue and yes K-Meleon's is win32 native while Mozilla uses xul.
K-Meleon development related discussions.
K-Meleon vs. Phoenix Scrolling
Posted by:
Aharon
Date: June 16, 2003 05:25PM
K-meleon's autoscrolling is much smoother on my display than Phoenix's autoscroll (which uses the Autoscroll xpi plugin).
Have other K-meleon/Phoenix users noticed this? If so, might the developers know why K-meleon's scrolling is smoother? It might be nice to share this secret with the other moz-scrolling developers, Autoscroll, Smoothscroll, and Multiscroll.
aharon
Display: IBM Thinkpad T30 LCD
Re: K-Meleon vs. Phoenix Scrolling
Posted by:
jsnj
Date: June 16, 2003 06:56PM
Yeah I've noticed that, but KM's autoscroll does have it's bugs, namely trying to use it within frames. But from what I've heard, Mozilla, Phoenix's or Firebird's (too many damn names) :-) autoscroll uses XUL. I think KM's autoscroll is native to Windows, so it wouldn't be an easy copy for cross platform development I assume. Just a guess though.
Re: K-Meleon vs. Phoenix Scrolling
Posted by:
asmpgmr
Date: June 16, 2003 07:05PM
Autoscrolling within frames is a known issue and yes K-Meleon's is win32 native while Mozilla uses xul.
English