Quote Scroogle
If you arrived here because you followed a link in recent stories about Scroogle's downtime on 2010-07-01, please be advised that Scroogle is now operating normally. Google has not restored the old simple interface so we are using a different one. We're not happy about this because the file we have to fetch from Google is three times more bloated for the same results. Also, our malware problem continues as before.
Forbidden
so sorry...
Google is temporarily blocking this Scroogle server.
Please wait ten minutes before trying again.
Yes, Scroogle is upset with Google.
1. Google handles 1 billion searches per day, while Scroogle handles 350,000 searches per day. This means that Scroogle is 0.035 percent of Google's load.
2. Google uses 900,000 servers, while Scroogle leases just six low-end dedicated servers.
3. Google has billions and billions of dollars in the bank, while Scroogle is a recognized public charity and survives on modest donations averaging $43 per day.
4. For more than seven years, Scroogle has always made serious efforts to detect and block any and all bots. Almost every Scroogle searcher is a live person clicking on a mouse. Yet Google treats Scroogle like a bot because they see the traffic from our six IP addresses as higher than normal. Searching Google with a bot is against Google's terms of service, but Scroogle users are not bots.
Quote panzer
Forbidden
so sorry...
Google is temporarily blocking this Scroogle server.
Please wait ten minutes before trying again.
Yes, Scroogle is upset with Google.
1. Google handles 1 billion searches per day, while Scroogle handles 350,000 searches per day. This means that Scroogle is 0.035 percent of Google's load.
2. Google uses 900,000 servers, while Scroogle leases just six low-end dedicated servers.
3. Google has billions and billions of dollars in the bank, while Scroogle is a recognized public charity and survives on modest donations averaging $43 per day.
4. For more than seven years, Scroogle has always made serious efforts to detect and block any and all bots. Almost every Scroogle searcher is a live person clicking on a mouse. Yet Google treats Scroogle like a bot because they see the traffic from our six IP addresses as higher than normal. Searching Google with a bot is against Google's terms of service, but Scroogle users are not bots.
panzer,
Scroogle http is definitely gone, but SSL is still working.
I'm anti-google so I've been using startpage.com as my primary search but I still access google through various free web based proxy servers and I've seen the junk they're adding to the results pages now. I used to use scroogle too. BTW, Ixquick and Startpage are the same company but ixquick results are more 'meta' while startpage are mostly anonymized google results.
In the google example above, the url redirection and ei= ved= usg= parameters in the search results are a way to apply tracking and other things to users with javascript disabled. Evil javascript would normally do all kinds of quiet logging and redirecting in the background but when a user has JS disabled goog is forced to run you through an obvious redirect through their servers and apply extra parameters to the url, due to their insatiable need to log and analyze your clicks and perhaps to provide referrer info for analytics and vile marketers.