: K-Meleon Forum
Use this forum to talk about a feature you're missing.
[quote=guenter] There are two XPI services (old Mozilla insecure versus new Firefox semi-secure). kko and I already had experimental Mozilla XPI service going. Even I can activate the service by hand. Nothing to develop it consists of just a bit of chrome, one .dll and one xpt. In fact we delete the needed components on every update.:D & disrupted can probably fully activate new Firefox XPI installer service when K-Meleon moves to K-M 1.6 & GRE 1.9.X. AFAIR alain and disrupted already have hacked installer far enough to ease the use of XUL applications during compatibility tests. But for what reason should K-Meleon have general XPI support ? In addition to disrupted's statement that K-Meleon cannot handle extensions that want to manipulate GUI XUL or use overlays. Some info he knows but does not mention. [quote=myself from other thread] Xulrunner/Firefox XPI installer service has an automatic application checking service. The extension creator/team must explicitly choose which applications are included into the supported list that is in each install.rdf. PPL would come here and rant this or that of 1000s of extensions does not install. And they would claim it is a K-Meleon bug.[/quote] Even if in the whole forum each was as productive as disrupted we could never fix all of these bugs. We could not even fix all that would be compatible - but where the vendor did not know or had forgotten to write into the install.rdf that K-Meleon was supported.[/quote]
K-Meleon forum is powered by