: K-Meleon Forum
General discussion about K-Meleon.
[quote=guenter] [quote=JohnHell] [quote=snuz2] I did some testing and I'm pretty sure I was wrong about Kmeleon XUL, it actually is the same as FF XUL. The only difference is that FF uses the XUL to display everything such as browser toolbars, menus, etc while Kmeleon maps these parts of the user interface to Windows MFC calls. If you write a xUL extension, it's user interface calls are handled by XUL rather than MFC even in KMeleon.[/quote] So? Whould you think, if develop, still going to Xulrunner (or whatever) or keep MFC ?[/quote] @ snuz2, wasn't that clear all together? BTW. Part of that connection that run the XUL "extensions" called Console2 and about:config is still broken in K-Meleon 1.7. There is nothing that can be done about it, even if someone knew C++, had spare time, an adequate system (PC and OS) and the MSVC compilers. Because the code in the CVS does not compile a stable K-Meleon.exe for a reason unknown to me. @ JohnHell I am currently aware of no developers willing to develop into either direction. So the question and the possible answer only raises vain hopes. Use 1.6 and 1.7 alphas and beta while You can. K-Meleon has been the most capable Gecko shell.[/quote]
K-Meleon forum is powered by