: K-Meleon Forum
General discussion about K-Meleon.
[quote=4td8s] [quote=snuz2] Another even simpler reason is the size of the memory cache. FF default may be higher. Although I would expect more of a constant difference with multiple tabs rather than the ratio he seems to report. Still, a tab doesn't necessarily eat a lot of resources and memory. Also, how customized is that FF? Any extensions? Extensions aren't under mozilla control and could be real memory hogs. [/quote] now you see why I use "browser.cache.memory.capacity" in FF and SM and use a certain "limit" on RAM cache with those browsers. even Netscape versions 8.x & 9.x use that value. [quote=ndebord] Can't speak to what happens with KM 1.6 alpha, as I've not yet played with that version. Alphas are something I play with when I have the time and these days I don't have any to spare there. Perhaps when we get to the Betas![/quote] I can say that the latest KM 1.6 alpha I've tested is as fast as KM 1.5.4. Just need to change the "user agent" strings of FF/SM to more "modern" versions as I had suggested [url=http://kmeleon.sourceforge.net/forum/read.php?1,103184,page=4]here[/url] for KM 1.6.[/quote]
K-Meleon forum is powered by